Is Human Transmutation Illegal in Fullmetal Alchemist? An Analytical View

In the animated series Fullmetal Alchemist (FMA), human transmutation is portrayed as a dangerous and morally contentious practice. The characters often view it as taboo, and the consequences of such actions are frequently catastrophic. However, the legality of human transmutation in FMA is a subject of debate among fans and viewers. This article delves into the legal and moral implications of human transmutation within the context of the series.

Legal and Moral Implications

The problem of human transmutation in FMA is more deeply rooted in its moral and ethical implications than in legal statutes. The series emphasizes the concept of equivalent exchange, a foundation of Alchemy law. According to this principle, anything gained in the alchemical process must be balanced by an equivalent loss. This moral framework, which is somewhat akin to a moral law, makes human transmutation a particularly risky and frowned-upon pursuit.

While there are no formal laws explicitly prohibitive of human transmutation, the societal views and the potential consequences make it a forbidden practice. The attempts by the Elric brothers to resurrect their mother resulted in significant personal sacrifices and changes in their lives. These ethical and moral considerations form the backbone of why human transmutation is considered both illegal and taboo within the FMA universe.

Key Debates and Opinions

Some viewers and fans argue that human transmutation is not strictly illegal but rather taboo due to the moral and ethical principles violated. One common argument is that there are no official laws against human transmutation, as evidenced by the fact that Father Cornelio, who publicly declares his intention to resurrect the dead, does not face immediate legal consequences. Additionally, even though many characters are aware of the Elric brothers' failed transmutation attempts, they do not face legal repercussions. Instead, the shame and societal disapproval of such actions serve as the main deterrent.

On the other hand, some assert that human transmutation is illegal, specifically for state alchemists. General Armstrong, a prominent figure in the FMA series, is often cited as stating that human transmutation is illegal. However, the exact context in which this statement is made and its definiteness can vary depending on the episode and the interpretation. The reference to Armstrong's statement often relates to the period when a state alchemist must adhere to very strict ethical and legal standards.

The Law of Equivalent Exchange

To better understand the illegal or taboo nature of human transmutation in FMA, it is crucial to examine the Law of Equivalent Exchange. According to this law, every alchemical transformation requires an equivalent exchange of materials or energy. This law serves as a moral framework that discourages actions that are not in accordance with this principle, especially those that attempt to cheat or manipulate the rules, such as human transmutation. The Elric brothers' experience highlights the consequences of trying to cheat this law, as their failed attempt resulted in significant personal losses and ethical dilemmas.

Conclusion

The legality of human transmutation in Fullmetal Alchemist varies depending on the perspective and the context within the series. While there are no explicit laws prohibiting this practice, the societal views and moral principles make it a highly taboo and illegal pursuit. The specific legal stance, such as whether it is illegal for state alchemists, remains a subject of debate among fans and viewers.

The Elric brothers' experience with human transmutation serves as a powerful narrative that underscores the ill effects of attempting to violate the Law of Equivalent Exchange. Their story teaches valuable lessons about the moral and ethical implications of attempting to defy natural restraints and the consequences that arise from such actions.