Introduction to the Debate

There has been a spirited discussion on the suitability of Viggo Mortensen and Sean Bean in their roles as Boromir and Aragorn, respectively, in the Lord of the Rings film trilogy. Some argue that Bean would have been a better fit for Boromir, while Mortensen would have made for a stronger Aragorn. This essay delves into the reasoning behind these claims, examining the physical attributes and personality traits described in the books, and ultimately questioning whether such swaps would significantly impact the films' narrative.

Physical Attributes and Descriptions

The books provide vivid descriptions of the protagonists. It is often stated that Viggo Mortensen is considered to look more handsome than Sean Bean, based on physical appearances. However, when we look at the descriptions of the characters, the arguments are more nuanced.

Aragorn is described as 'lean,' in contrast to Boromir, who is described as 'broad and heavy in build.' According to the book, Aragorn is the tallest of the Company, whereas Boromir is only slightly shorter. Viggo Mortensen, at 5'11", and Sean Bean, at 5'10", are both fairly tall, but Bean appears notably broader. Furthermore, Bean's square jaw and broader build match the physical description of Boromir better.

The debate about 'handsomeness' is subjective. Boromir is unequivocally described as 'beautiful' in his death. However, this subjective quality means that preference is largely a matter of personal opinion. While Bean might be considered handsomer by some, it is arguable that Mortensen's more sculpted, regal appearance might resonate more with the character of Aragorn.

The Actors and Their Impact on Character Development

It is important to recognize that the storyline of The Lord of the Rings remains constant regardless of the actors involved. Characters like Aragorn and Boromir would still have the same depth of backstory, motivations, and development, even if played by different actors.

The argument for Bean as Boromir and Mortensen as Aragorn revolves around the physical traits and the perceived 'handsomeness' of the actors. Bean, with his more square jaw and broad build, would have been a more physical match for the character of Boromir. However, Mortensen's more refined, noble appearance would have been more in line with Aragorn's regal demeanor. In terms of performance, both actors are highly skilled and would have brought their own interpretation to the roles, but the fundamental story and character traits would remain unchanged.

Additionally, the argument for a switch in roles raises questions about the casting decision in the first place. Casting is a complex process, and the selection of Bean as Boromir and Mortensen as Aragorn was likely informed by a combination of physical characteristics, acting skills, and overall fit for the characters as seen by the producers and directors.

Conclusion

While the debate about the ideal casting of Viggo Mortensen and Sean Bean for roles in The Lord of the Rings remains contentious, it is important to acknowledge that the story and characters would have played out fundamentally the same, no matter who played them. The actors bring unique interpretations and performances, but the core narrative, motives, and character development would remain unchanged. The debate thus leans more on subjective preferences and ideal casting rather than objective impact on the story's outcome.