The Evolution of Comic Characters: Is Rewriting for LGBTQ Representation Causing More Harm Than Good?

The world of comic books is evolving, but not always for the better. One of the latest controversies involves the rewriting of established characters to fit contemporary political agendas, particularly revolving around LGBTQ representation. This article dives into the reasons behind these changes and explores whether they are beneficial or detrimental to the fandom.

Leftism and Heteronormativity

In the eyes of many leftists, heteronormativity is an outdated concept that needs to be challenged. They argue that sexuality is a social construct and that by changing characters to be considered 'gay,' they can shift societal norms. However, this approach often backfires, alienating a significant portion of the comic book audience.

Impact on Sales and Fanbase

The practical effects of these changes are evident in the shift from comic books to manga. Manga, with its robust LGBTQ representation, has seen a surge in popularity, while comic book sales have suffered. Fans no longer feel compelled to purchase comics because the alterations do little to enhance the story or the characters.

The Problem with Rewriting Characters

The writers at DC and Marvel are attempting to cater to a perceived "modern audience" that doesn't really exist. They believe that a majority of their readers are gay and will flock to comics as soon as they are marketed as such. This assumption is misguided and doesn't reflect the reality of the comic book industry.

For example, classic Superman was an embodiment of "boy scout" values, yet modern writers continue to portray him as a metaphorical "Dark Knight in tights." This reimagining fails to resonate with audiences and only alienates those who once embraced the traditional versions of these characters.

Representation and Sensitivity

When writing for the LGBTQ community, it's important to approach the topic with sensitivity and respect. The story of Superman's son, for instance, has been altered to include an element of bisexuality. While this is a step in the right direction, it should be done carefully and without forcing the issue.

The rewriting needs to be authentic and not forced to be in everyone's face. If a character's sexuality is a central part of the story, then it should be treated with care and depth. However, if it's only a side element, it's best to avoid making it front and center, as this can come across as shallow and exploitative.

The son character isn't particularly old, and it's unclear why he was suddenly described as bisexual. This change seems like a hasty move without much consideration for the character's established history and the fans who have invested in him.

Conclusion

The ongoing efforts to rewrite characters for LGBTQ representation are promising, but they must be approached with caution. Successful representation requires sensitivity, thoughtfulness, and an understanding of the fandom's needs and desires. It's important for comic book creators to balance the need for progress with the respect for established narratives and fan loyalty.

Ultimately, the key is to tell stories that resonate with audiences on a deeper level, rather than pandering to a perceived trend. Only then can comic books truly thrive and remain a beloved form of entertainment for generations to come.

Keywords: comic characters, LGBTQ representation, character rewriting