The Inaccuracies of the Movie 'Split' and Its Impact on Dissociative Identity Disorder

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), also known as multiple personality disorder, is a serious mental health condition. lsquo;Splitrsquo; is a movie that has garnered significant attention due to its portrayal of DID. However, it is crucial to recognize the inaccuracy and potential harm caused by such dramatizations, particularly in how they shape public perception and understanding of DID.

Accurate Portrayals of Dissociative Identity Disorder

DID is a complex and misunderstood condition. It involves the presence of two or more distinct identity or personality states, each with its own pattern of perceiving and interacting with the environment. Unlike the depictions in 'Split', DID is not characterized by evil alters or murderous rages. It is a survival mechanism developed as a result of severe, prolonged, and chronic trauma, typically experienced in childhood.

Individuals with DID generally reside quietly and privately, as the condition is often developed to help them navigate a daily life that might otherwise be overwhelmed by the traumatic memories and experiences. They are not preying upon society; rather, they are often survivors of childhood abuse, neglect, or other forms of trauma.

The Stigma Surrounding Dissociative Identity Disorder

Unfortunately, movies like 'Split' contribute significantly to the stigma surrounding DID. Misleading portrayals can foster false beliefs and prejudices, leading to further marginalization and misunderstanding of those living with DID. This stigma can have detrimental effects on the individuals affected, causing them to feel marginalized, misunderstood, and tentative about sharing their lived experiences.

For example, after the release of 'Split', there was a noticeable uptick in inquiries about the reality and dangers of DID. Questions such as lsquo;How dangerous are people with DID?rsquo; or lsquo;Is it possible to have DID if you donrsquo;t have an evil alter?rsquo; reflect the groundwork laid by sensationalized portrayals in films. These inquiries not only perpetuate misunderstanding but also add to the pre-existing social stigma.

The Realities of Living with Dissociative Identity Disorder

Those living with DID often maintain regular, quiet lives, managing their condition in ways that minimize disruption to their daily routines. Despite this, the condition remains a profound challenge, often coexisting with other mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), clinical depression, anxiety, and physical health problems.

The experiences of those with DID are incredibly varied and complex. The majority are small children or individuals who do not speak fully or at all, reflecting their attempts to survive and cope with traumatic events. Others, including adults, developed DID as a means to endure and navigate their environments. These individuals do not use their condition for malicious purposes and are not as depicted in lsquo;Splitrsquo;.

The Impact of 'Split' on Perceptions and Misunderstandings

The movie lsquo;Splitrsquo; not only misrepresents the reality of DID but also trivializes the condition. It fails to acknowledge the deep trauma and the intricate survival strategies employed by those with DID. By reducing a complex mental health condition to sensationalized plot points, the film misleads the public and contributes to significant misinformation.

The impact of such portrayals is profound, as it affects not only the individuals living with DID but also society as a whole. People may avoid discussing or acknowledging the condition due to fear of misconceptions, further marginalizing those in need of support. Furthermore, it can lead to unjustified fear and discrimination, with individuals potentially being treated with suspicion and misunderstanding.

Conclusion

Accurate and respectful portrayals of mental health conditions are essential for fostering understanding and compassion. In the case of Dissociative Identity Disorder, sensationalized and inaccurate portrayals in media can do more harm than good. The real experiences of those with DID are far more nuanced and profound than the depictions in lsquo;Splitrsquo;.

It is vital for the public to be informed by accurate sources and to critically evaluate media portrayals to develop a more accurate and nuanced understanding of Dissociative Identity Disorder. Only through such understanding can we hope to support and alleviate the suffering of those living with this condition.