Veteran’s Perspective on US Gun Laws: A Persistent Debacle

As a veteran, my thoughts on US gun laws are deeply rooted in reality and experience. The proliferation of firearms in the United States, despite numerous laws and regulations, is a reality that cannot be ignored. My own deployment and the narratives from my fellow combat veterans and infantry units have reinforced this viewpoint. It is often argued that guns can be easily obtained, especially in a country where firearm knowledge and ammunition are readily accessible.[1]

The concept of gun control in America is often seen as a futile endeavor. The idea that legislation can completely eradicate the right to bear arms is naive. Even if gun control laws were to be implemented, it would not prevent individuals from finding ways to arm themselves with the best weapons available. This is not merely a theoretical concern; it is a stark reality that many veterans have experienced on both fronts of battlefield and home.

The argument that owning firearms serves as a means of defending against a potential tyrannical government cannot be dismissed lightly. The story of the Vietnam War and other conflicts underscores the challenges faced by modern militaries against well-armed militia. Even the most technologically advanced and highly trained military forces have struggled against illiterate but well-armed opponents. [2]

Gun Control and the Constitution

The United States has over 22,000 gun laws, yet nowhere in the Constitution does it state, “except for this consideration.” Every existing gun law in the country is unconstitutional. This is a bold statement, but it is based on the understanding that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms, which should not be limited or restricted without a compelling reason.[3]

In my home state of California, the gun laws are particularly stringent and often impractical. The California State Military Reserve often lacks the availability of state-issued National Guard arms. Furthermore, while mental health assessments and court proceedings can be used to address individuals who should not have firearms, such measures do not align with the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution.[4]

Personal Preferences and Perspective

I prefer the 1911 pistol chambered in Cal. .45 over the 9 mm or .40 Cal. pistol. Additionally, I live in a Castle Doctrine state, where the right of self-defense is recognized, though there are legal limitations. The term “assault rifle” is often misunderstood and applied simplistically, leading to unnecessary fear and misconceptions.[5]

The newer 6.8 x 43 mm round is considered a better military and hunting round, while the older 7.62 x 51 mm .308 is an excellent long-range round. The 5.56 x 45 mm and .223 hunting rifle are effectively the same caliber, and the diversity in firearms allows for better adaptation to various needs and preferences.[6]

Conclusion

Ultimately, my stance against strict gun control laws is driven by the unwavering belief that these laws will not significantly impact the overall availability of firearms. Ultimately, the psychos and dangerous individuals will find ways to arm themselves despite the rules and regulations put in place. I support the right to bear arms, believing that it is essential for personal safety and defense. Until a trustworthy government is established that can guarantee peace and security without fear of extrajudicial violence, the right to bear arms remains a fundamental and necessary aspect of our society.[7]

[1] Personal observation and experience-based information from combat veterans and infantry units.

[2] Example of the challenges faced by modern militaries against well-armed militia in various conflicts.

[3] Analysis of the Second Amendment and US Constitution.

[4] Personal experience living in a state with stringent gun laws and military reserves.

[5] Personal preference and understanding of firearms and hunting rounds.

[6] Explanation of the different types of firearms and their uses.

[7] Conclusion based on personal beliefs and experiences.