Comprehensive Analysis: Polish Saber vs. Arming Sword - Which is Better?

When it comes to choosing between a saber, particularly a Polish saber, and an arming sword, the decision largely depends on the combat environment and the protection your opponent might wear. This article will delve into the pros and cons of both weapons, providing an in-depth comparison based on historical context and modern interpretations.

Context Determines Combat Effectiveness

Understanding the context of the combat situation is crucial in determining which weapon is more effective. For instance, if your opponent is wearing mail armor, an arming sword is generally a more reliable choice. However, when facing an opponent in plate or brigandine armor, the arming sword becomes slightly less useful but still offers versatility in thrusting attacks.

While the arming sword was not the primary weapon in armored combat, it excelled in thrusting for gaps and damaging links in mail armor. In unarmored combat, especially when mounted, a saber has distinct advantages due to its slashing capabilities. The effectiveness of both weapons often comes down to the combatants involved. Swords like the arming sword often came with a shield for added protection, while the saber often paired well with a pistol for quick, mobile combat.

Preferred Weapon Choices

Consideration for the specific context in which one might find themselves also influences the preference for a particular weapon. If riding a horse, a saber is undoubtedly a better choice due to its design. Historically, even the cutlass was a shortened form of a saber, making it an excellent dual-purpose weapon.

However, arming swords are predominantly footman's weapons and are too short and light for cavalry use. An arming sword, typically double-edged, is at its best when wielded with a shield, much like the gladius, the Roman sword. If you have a preference for versatile blades, an arming sword offers this with its traditional shield system. Alternatively, a saber provides additional hand protection and is often used in conjunction with a pistol, a combination that suits more dynamic and mobile combat scenarios.

My personal preference leans towards sabers, particularly British military sabers. This is because I do not wear plate or mail, nor do I expect to face opponents in such armor. The hand protection provided by sabers is a significant advantage. Among British sabers, the 1896 Cavalry Sabre is particularly favored, with its pommels fitting my hand comfortably.

Saber and Arming Sword Use in Historical Context

Historical examples such as the Winged Hussar of 1683 and the US Cavalry of 1860 provide valuable insights. The Polish saber, for example, was extensively used by the Winged Hussars, a formidable cavalry force known for its unique saber and stunning parade uniforms. Meanwhile, the arming sword was a common sidearm for infantry and a basic weapon in the hands of medieval knights.

A Polish saber might be ideal for historical reenactments or situations where a slashing weapon is preferred, especially in cavalry charges. An arming sword, on the other hand, might be more suitable for reenactments that focus on close combat scenarios involving infantry or light cavalry.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the saber and the arming sword have their strengths and weaknesses. The choice between them depends on the context of the combat and the expected resistance. If you are determined to make the best decision, consider the practicality, historical context, and your personal preferences. Whether you favor the versatility of the arming sword or the striking power of the saber, each weapon has its place in the realm of historical and modern martial arts.