Why Don't Witches and Wizards Marry Muggles or Squibs in the Harry Potter Universe?

In the Harry Potter universe, the relationship between witches, wizards, and Muggles (non-magical people) is complex and often governed by various social and legal restrictions. This article delves into the reasons why, in specific regions, particularly in the United States, witches and wizards might not marry Muggles or Squibs, even though they can have children with them.

Secrecy Laws: Keeping Magic Hidden

One of the primary reasons for the restrictions on marriage between witches/wizards and Muggles is the need to keep the magical world hidden from Muggles. In the United States, the MACUSA (Magical Congress of the United States of America) imposed strict laws to prevent witches and wizards from marrying No Majs (Muggles), a practice known as Rappaport's Law. This was a legal measure designed to maintain secrecy and prevent any hint of the magical world from leaking into the mainstream.

In the United Kingdom, although there were no outright bans, there were still restrictions in place. Witches and wizards were not allowed to reveal their magical world to their Muggle spouses, and they couldn't use their powers in front of Muggles. This requirement forced them to give up a significant part of themselves, creating a sense of alienation from their non-magical partners.

Historical Background

The origins of these marriage restrictions trace back to a period of significant tension between wizards and Muggles. In the 17th century, the Scourers, who were skilled witch hunters, married into Muggle communities and lost their magical powers as a result. This practice, often referred to as 'winnowing out', contributed to a distrust and hostility between Muggles and witches/wizards.

One notable event occurred in 1695 when a Scourer befriended and tricked a witch named Dorcus Twelvetrees into revealing secrets of the magical world to a Muggle, a breach that fueled the introduction of even stricter secrecy laws. These laws were not meant to punish Muggles or wizards, but rather to prevent any chance of revelation. The International Statute of Secrecy established in 1689 provided the backdrop against which these laws were enacted.

Parallel to Real-World Issues

Out of the world, the parallels to real-world historical events are evident. The writers drew an unsubtle comparison between Rappaport's Law and Jim Crow laws, which enforced racial segregation in the United States. Both sets of laws were eventually repealed in 1965, highlighting the struggle for equality and freedom.

Practical Concerns and Blood Purism

Beyond the need for secrecy, there are practical concerns and blood purity issues. Some members of the wizarding community, particularly those with extreme blood-purist views, believed that witches and wizards should not marry Muggles to maintain the purity of their blood.

Notably, the Ministry of Magic in the United Kingdom had a disproportionate influence from pure-blood families. Senior officials, including the Minister, were often from pure-blood lines. This reflects a societal preference for maintaining the integrity of magical bloodlines, which is a form of social and cultural preservation.

Squirbs: A Different Story

Regarding Squibs (individuals born to magical families but lacking magical abilities), their integration into the wizarding world is a more complex issue. While we see examples of Squibs who are accepted within the wizarding community, such as Ernie Macmilian's wife, Mrs. Figg, and Argus Filch's working position, their acceptance is not universal. The general sentiment appears to be one of begrudging acceptance.

These examples highlight the various dynamics and tensions between the magical and non-magical worlds. The Harry Potter series provides a rich tapestry of social, cultural, and legal issues that reflect both the magical and real-world complexities of human relationships and societal norms.