Why Most Star Wars Fans Disapprove of the Sequels

The sequel trilogy of the Star Wars saga has been the subject of mixed reviews since its release. While some fans celebrate the films for their improved dialogue and relatable characters, a significant portion of the Star Wars enthusiast community remains critical of these movies. This article explores the reasons behind this disagreement, focusing on the flawed plot, perceived lack of originality, and the controversial decision to create their own canonical timeline.

The Plot and Structure of the Sequel Trilogy

Many fans argue that the sequel trilogy is disjointed and slapdash, failing to maintain the cohesiveness and vision of the original trilogy. The expansion of the galaxy and its factions, particularly the First Order, is often criticized for lacking the depth and originality seen in the prequels. Characters like Rey, introduced in The Force Awakens, are frequently criticized for being a Mary Sue, a trope that represents a character who breaks all the rules and is nearly perfect.

Factions and Characters in the Sequel Trilogy

The faction of the First Order, formed by remaining Imperials who train their Stormtroopers since childhood, is often seen as a cheap imitation of the Imperial Remnant. The conflict they face, against the Resistance rather than the New Republic, is perceived as an anticlimactic move. Similarly, the characters in the sequel trilogy are often criticized for poor development and lack of authenticity:

Leia Organa: The leader of a rebel group, often seen as a less influential character compared to her role in the original trilogy. Han Solo: Returning to his old ways as a smuggler despite significant character growth in the original series. Masatoa Skywalker: Dying as an old hermit without fulfilling his destiny of training Rey. Poe Dameron and Finn: Characters with clear potential but wasted storylines. Snoke: Introduced with little background, killed off early, and resurrected by Palpatine, leading to fan criticism about continuity issues. Rey: A character hailed as the new Chosen One, but her abilities and backstory are considered unrealistic. Her connection to the Jedi lineage and the Skywalker family is disputed.

The Canon Split and Originality Concerns

Another major point of contention is the creation of a new timeline and the canon split between Canon and Legends. This was done to justify the new storylines and characters of the sequel trilogy. The decision is seen as an attempt to define new rules for the franchise, which some see as an unnecessary step away from the original narrative. Many fans believe George Lucas had better ideas for a sequel trilogy, emphasizing the perceived lack of foresight in the filmmakers' approach.

In conclusion, while the sequel trilogy attempts to bring fresh perspectives and relatable characters to the Star Wars universe, it often stumbles on cohesiveness, character development, and originality. The ongoing debate among fans highlights the complex relationship between nostalgia and innovation in storytelling.